1. What is the process for selecting and publishing manuscripts for each journal?
For School Library Research, manuscripts are reviewed through a “double blind” process which means neither the author of the manuscript nor the referee knows of the other’s identity or professional qualifications. Manuscripts are reviewed by three to five referees during the initial review and the review process takes eight to twelve weeks to complete. Referees are professionals in the academic library field and work together with the editorial board. Referees consider a variety of questions when reviewing manuscripts and authors may be asked to revise a manuscript multiple times before being approved by a majority of referees. Manuscripts must then be approved by the full editorial board before being submitted for publication. Manuscripts must be either research reports, conceptual essays, or literature review and proposal papers. Authors must follow APA formatting and School Library Research specific formatting and submission guidelines as well.
For Evidence Based Library and Information Practice, submissions are also reviewed through a double-blind process that can take up to three months to complete. The EBLIP Editorial Board has final approval on all submissions. Authors must follow strict EBLIP and APA formatting and all submissions must be reports of original research, review articles, reports of using evidence in practice, commentaries, summaries, classics, research in practice, features, news items, or letters to the editor.
2. Evaluate the publications for authority. For example, what are the credentials of the editorial board members and/or advisory committees for each journal?
The School Library Research website lists both the current editorial board and the founding editorial board along with their credentials and backgrounds. All board members save one hold a Ph. D. School Library Research is also the official research journal of AASL. AASL is a professional organization for school librarians and is an affiliate of ALA. Both organizations are non-profit serving the purpose of furthering the profession of librarians. SLR is absolutely a trustworthy source for research articles.
Evidence Based Library and Information Practice is published by the University of Alberta Learning Services with the stated purpose of providing a forum for librarians and other information professionals to discover research that may contribute to decision making in professional practice. Their editorial board and contributors, including all peer reviewers are listed on the website alongside their credentials. Many include Ph.D’s, but not all. EBLIP is a trustworthy source as well.
3. Evaluate SLR and EBLIP as resources. What topics interest you the most? What research studies and articles do you want to read and why? Which ones relate to your present practice? Select 2-3; provide citations for the articles you want to read in a References section at the end of your blog post (APA-formatted).
I am hoping to work as a middle school librarian some day, so I am more interested in articles about this particular age group, and I’m also very interested in the use and application of technology in libraries, as well as graphic novels for adolescents. I am starting my first year as an elementary school librarian this upcoming school year, so I am curious about research at this age level as well. Through looking through their more recent versions, I seemed to find more articles interesting to me in SLR. EBLIP had a lot of research about academic and university libraries with less information about school libraries and younger students. ELBIP also has a much wider variety of articles and types of writing available in their issues, and they are published more frequently. I found the following articles to be most interesting.
Moeller, R. A., & Becnel, K. (2018). Drawing diversity: Representations of race in graphic novels for young adults. School Library Research, 21
Moore, J., & Cahill, M. (2016). Audiobooks: Legitimate “reading” material for adolescents? School Library Research, 19
Tewell, E., & Angell, K. (2015). Far from a Trivial Pursuit: Assessing the Effectiveness of Games in Information Literacy Instruction. Evidence Based Library and Information Practice, 10(1), 20-33. https://doi.org/10.18438/B8B60X